Note: This is an automated translation (using DeepL) of the original German article.
Simulation models are an ideal tool to answer “What if…?” questions. One such question is how to safely hold music festivals in times of a pandemic.
To answer the question “What if we use this or that security concept for the festival? “ DEXHELPP, together with dwh GmbH and TU Wien, conducted a simulation study for the FM4 Frequency Festival.
The study focused on the question of which strategy would detect as many infected persons as possible and thus break infection chains. For this purpose, the legally provided 3G strategy (entry only with proof of being infected, vaccinated or tested) was contrasted with a stricter testing strategy. In this stricter strategy “3G-PCR “ all persons who are not vaccinated or recovered must take a PCR entry test on site.
Firstly, it was shown that thanks to the stricter “3G-PCR” entry rule, a large proportion of infected persons are already fished out of the system at entry. As a result, the number of new infections detected by the antigen test 72 hours after entering the site is reduced by 40%. Secondly, a significant influence of the vaccination coverage among festival visitors can be observed. Thus, at a 70% vaccination coverage rate, the number of new infections confirmed at the festival decreases by over 40%, compared to a 50% vaccination coverage rate.
In addition, the rule of not having to be tested if vaccinated presumably provides an incentive for visitors to take up vaccination appointments. This is a positive aspect in that, especially for autumn, the highest possible vaccination coverage rate must be achieved to prevent an increase in the number of cases. It would therefore be ideal to actively promote vaccination in the run-up to the event in order to motivate target groups that are difficult to reach to be vaccinated.
In addition to new infections, the impact on the health care system is relevant. Here we see, especially by the composition of the age groups of the visitors, that only an (for the health system)insignificantly small number of people need medical care. This does not include further infections, e.g. among the elderly after the festival.
For the event - and thus the simulation - the specifications of the organizers were:
The entrance test will intercept a large proportion of Covid-infected individuals at the entrance. However, due to the diagnostic window, as well as the (very small) possibility of being infected shortly before entry despite vaccination or recovery, it is impossible to intercept 100% of all Covid-infected individuals.
With these assumptions, four different scenarios (each for the 4- and 3-day festival) were tested:
The number of new infections detected by antigen testing at the festival was compared and can be seen for the 4-day festival in figure 1. Results for the 3-day festival are not meaningful due to the limitations (see below).